A Groundbreaking Court Decision for Vets with PTSD
From the Pres
October 21, 2009
A jury came back with a verdict this week that could have a significant impact on Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans with PTSD throughout the country, who have been accused of violent crimes. I have mentioned in a previous blog entry the work that Dr. William “Bud” Brown is doing in Oregon on Veteran defense cases. I just finished working with Bud and his team from The Bunker Project, helping to defend a young Veteran with severe PTSD named Jesse Bratcher, from John Day, Oregon, who was accused of killing a man he believed had raped his girlfriend. I have been consulting for months on the case and recommended John Keaveney, the Founder of the Veteran Program New Directions, to serve as an expert witness for the defense on the subject of PTSD. John Keaveney is a fellow Vietnam Veteran who I counseled many years ago in dealing with his own PTSD. John went on to create New Directions, the most comprehensive treatment program in the nation for veterans suffering from substance abuse, PTSD and co-occurring disorder. The story of the defendant, Jesse Bratcher, is one of a normal, law-abiding young man whose mental condition was changed dramatically, for the worse, by his experiences in the Iraq war. He was raised by his grandparents in Eastern Oregon, who describe him as a “perfect boy.” He graduated high school with a B average. Jesse had no problems with the law before he joined the Oregon National Guard, and was sent to Iraq for a combat tour as a machine gunner for an armored division. Jesse had a lifelong aversion to guns, which made the military a strange choice, until you consider the lack of options for a poor boy with a high school education from rural Oregon. Jesse’s unit was sent to Iraq, where he took the U.S. rules of engagement very seriously, even memorizing them. He twice refused to fire on civilians his platoon engaged, even writing up a complaint when men from his unit shot and killed a civilian Iraqi who was armed, but not acting in a hostile manner. Jesse’s best friend was killed during their tour when his Humvee, in front of Jesse, was hit by an IED explosion. His commanders say Jesse was never the same afterwards. When Jesse returned from Iraq, his grandparents noticed a significant difference in his behavior. The sweet, easy-going boy they had raised was now prone to angry outbursts. He had trouble sleeping. He spent days sleeping in the woods and set up perimeters and establishing fields-of-fire, where he carried, slept with, and maintained his AK-47. The men in his reserve unit noticed a difference, too. Jesse began missing formations, when he had never had a problem before. He had a particular stare that made the other men uneasy. He complained of flashbacks. He was angry all the time. Eventually, a commander suggested he visit the VA in Boise, Idaho 4and get checked out. After numerous visits to the VA, and one rejection of benefits, Jesse was diagnosed with PTSD, with a 100% disabled rating, and started receiving treatment. Things started to improve for Jesse. He got a girlfriend and they became serious. She got pregnant and Jesse was excited about becoming a father. They had plans to get married. He was attending his VA appointments regularly and beginning to feel better. Then, one night, his girlfriend told him something that changed everything. While he was in Boise for one of his counseling appointments, she had gone out drinking with a girlfriend. She met a man that night she said raped her. She was not sure who the baby’s father was. That night, Jesse put the barrel of his AK-47 in his mouth and almost pulled the trigger. Two days later, he got in the car with his girlfriend with the intention of reporting the rape to the police. He instead ended up on the front lawn of the man his girlfriend accused of raping her. He had tried several times to contact the police. He was unsuccessful. After confronting the alleged rapist, Jessie experienced a flashback during which he shot and killed the victim. The defense team argued that he should not be held criminally liable for the killing, as his PTSD, produced by his war experiences, made him legally insane at the time of the shooting.
The jury agreed, and yesterday they came back with a verdict of guilty by reason of insanity. This is the first time that PTSD has affected the verdict of a soldier accused of a violent crime after returning home from war, and it could set a significant precedence in similar cases popping up all over the country. Dr. William “Bud Brown is a Vietnam combat Veteran who credits the counseling he received at a Vietnam Veteran Outreach Center, a program I founded and co-authored, with saving his life and putting him on the road towards a university education and the work he is doing today. He has a PhD in Sociology. In addition to his work on The Bunker Project, he teaches Criminology at Western Oregon University.






COMMENTS
+ Add Comments
Julien A.
December 14, 2009
I have been researching the symptoms that are given the diagnosis of PTSD by those in the mental health field and my understanding of this condition is vastly different than that which is proposed by psychiatry. Regardless, I will pose a question using the diagnosis that is generally given. The article mentions that he was receiving treatment, although it doesn't state the nature of the treatment itself. If he was taking psychotropic medications, some of which have already been linked with acts of violence, is it not possible that his actions were due to drugs rather than his diagnosis of PTSD?
Margaret H.
November 14, 2009
Article states: a verdict of guilty by reason of insanity. I suspect exposure to glycol ether causes PTSD and 'the syndromes' of wars down through the century. The angry all the time ... disjointed thinking, could be autoimmune central nervous system issues. Could also affect future generations; can cause zero sperm. Does this young man have FATIGUE? Is there blood in urine, etc? Glycol Ethers are pesticides, solvents, poisons, neurotoxins, and teratogens. Too much exposure 'looks like' the flu. http://www.valdezlink.com/re/health/thinking/ptsd/whatis.htm
Hank T.
November 4, 2009
PART TWO
Ask yourself, of the thousands of combat veterans of Vietnam, where are the murders consistent with the murder in the story? They aren't there they exist only in the movies and on TV. And what is the percentage of war veterans who commit murder compared to murders committed by people who aren't war veterans? Don't be surprised if the percentages are comparable.
And let's not overlook how condemnatory this matter is of the therapeutic profession: this guy commits his PTSD-excused murder AFTER he receives compensation, treatment, and medication. The guy was told, in effect, that now you have carte blanche to commit any crime that pops into your head -don't worry about resisting the impulse.
And now the word is out, if you have the PTSD rating, anything is permitted.
This court ruling does severe damage to the image of war veterans. The guy should have been found guilty, period: life in prison or lethal injection.
Hank T.
November 4, 2009
PART ONE
Like Ronald H., I too served with the 4th ID in Vietnam as an infantryman in 66-67. I was wounded twice and received two Purple Hearts.
Also like Ronald H. I have a total and permanent service-connected rating for PTSD. For the very reason that clinical Depression is the classic secondary diagnosis for PTSD, bad behavior, including violence, towards others is a mischaracterization of what PTSD really is: it's a self-punishing disorder: Depression is self-punishing. The other features of PTSD, especially "flashbacks" are political ploys to disparage those who served in Vietnam. Additionally, flashbacks are cinematic, and by way of movies and television this hardly existent feature of PTSD has poisoned the public mind about Vietnam veterans.
Sam T.
November 3, 2009
What the hell is PTSD some ask why didn't the WWII people get it. They did I've talked with many of them and even in their 80's they still break down into tears from the horiffic things that were etched in their minds. Myself after 1 1/2 years in Nam I thought I was OK and refused to get help until this year all the time suffering from various illnesses from intestinal to migraines you name it. Well once I caved in and took the Doctors advice the headaches went away with the correct medication to late for the colon it's in a jar somewhere. My family suffered tremendously from my flare ups always saying put a bullet in their head problem solved ( now that isn't right ). the only thing that did was make them wonder how sane I was, I also knew I had problems because I stayed away from crowds of people, didn't go to fireworks because of the feeling of being back in Nam again. knowing I was here but not rationalising it properly. The list goes on and on with the nightmares, the health problems the verbal and mental abuse I put upon my family and co-workers. Why is it not ok in my mind to kill animals but I would kill a person doing wrong in a heartbeat, and by my perspective is the person I question really doing wrong or am I just messed up? Yes there is a difference in a war veteran and a non, the psycological trama instilled will never go away but can be controlled if we just throw pride aside and reach out to those trying desperately to help us. Thank You to all that fought, welcome home and may GOD BLESS.
1 2 3 — Next » Last »